Compare
Developers and product teams turn to Resend for its clean API, React email support, and modern developer experience. But as teams scale into multi-domain sending with domain-level reputation and IP controls, stricter compliance needs, advanced analytics, or predictable pricing, many start looking for a Resend alternative that offers stronger deliverability, richer features, or enterprise-grade support.
This guide covers the best Resend alternatives, including commercial and open-source platforms. Each provider was tested using real workloads to evaluate developer experience, integration speed, reliability, pricing clarity, and support responsiveness.
Whether you’re building transactional workflows, marketing campaigns, or lifecycle automation at scale, this guide will help you choose the right fit – and migrate without risking deliverability.
Resend is a developer-first email API service launched in 2023. It’s known for its minimalist API, TypeScript-forward tooling, and support for React-based email templates. Teams choose Resend because it’s easy to integrate and offers clean logs and basic event observability.
But resonance in the startup community also comes with limitations. Teams consider a Resend alternative when they need:
If you’re scaling beyond “simple API + logs,” exploring alternatives is smart before you accrue technical debt or deliverability issues.
Most teams seeking a Resend alternative cite one or more of these core drivers:
If these challenges match your use case, one of the alternatives below will serve you better.
Every provider in this guide was evaluated through hands-on integration testing using real API calls, SMTP relays, and limited-volume test sends. A human reviewer attempted to integrate each service using typical developer workflows.
Selection was based on:
G2: 4.2★ (based on 200+ reviews).
Mailgun is designed for engineering teams that need predictable deliverability and deep observability. It provides developer-first APIs, inbox placement testing and reputation monitoring tools, and clear scaling paths. Mailgun fits teams that want a scalable, API-first foundation with enterprise-grade tooling
Pricing overview
Standout features
Primary use cases
Pros / Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep deliverability tooling | Dedicated IPs gated to higher plans |
| Strong developer docs and SDKs | No native drag-and-drop marketing suite |
| Predictable logging & analytics |
Who it’s best for
Backend engineers, platform teams, and deliverability specialists who want control, transparency, and compliance-ready infrastructure.
G2: 4.0★ (based on ~170 reviews).
Mailjet blends marketing features with transactional APIs. It gives non-technical teams friendly editors while preserving programmatic access for developers.
Pricing overview
Standout features
Primary use cases
Pros / Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Good for marketers and less technical users | Less advanced developer-focused API control compared to transactional-first providers |
| Built-in campaign tools | Deliverability and infrastructure tools aren’t as robust for high-volume or deeply technical use cases |
Who it’s best for
Marketing-led teams that need transactional parity without separate vendors.
G2: 4.0★ (based on ~350+ reviews).
SendGrid offers both a powerful API and a full marketing suite. It’s highly adopted, widely documented, and good for teams who need multi-channel integrations.
Pricing overview
Standout features
Primary use cases
Pros / Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Integrations and templates | Deliverability insights and control can be limited on shared IPs without dedicated plans |
| Scales well | Support quality varies by plan |
Who it’s best for
Cross-functional teams that want one vendor for both campaigns and product email.
G2: 4.6★ (based on 20+ reviews)
Postmark is built for transactional messaging. It’s known for its speed and is easy to set up and use. It focuses on inbox placement and minimal configuration for rapid time-to-first-send.
Pricing overview
Standout features
Primary use cases
Pros / Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Proven, reliable delivery; been around since 2010 | Limits on Message Streams for marketing emails and broadcast sending |
| User-friendly for non-technical users | Limited advanced analytics |
| Longer data retention period (45 days) |
Who it’s best for
Developers who want reliable email delivery without the complexity of an all-in-one marketing platform.
Amazon SES offers a low-cost, highly scalable service tightly integrated with AWS. It’s an attractive choice for teams already on AWS that want minimal vendor lock-in.
Pricing overview
Standout features
Primary use cases
Pros / Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Extremely low cost | Complex setup and limited UI analytics |
| AWS-native integrations | Support is ticket-based; fewer guided tools |
Who it’s best for
Engineering teams that prioritize cost and AWS integration over onboarding ease.
A service offering similar or improved transactional email capabilities, often with better deliverability, analytics, or pricing.
Mailgun offers one of the most complete combinations of developer-friendly APIs, deliverability tooling, and predictable scaling for high-volume senders.
Yes – Plunk, Listmonk, Postal, Unsend, and DoubleZero are all good open-source options.
Most migrations take 1–3 days with dual-sending.
Choosing the right Resend alternative depends on your technical stack, compliance needs, and growth plans. If you want the strongest combination of developer experience, deliverability, analytics, and scalability, Mailgun remains the most reliable choice.
This guide was created by the team at Mailgun by Sinch. While we’ve aimed for a fair comparison of popular email services, our goal is to show you where Mailgun shines. We hope this helps you make the right choice for your needs. Last updated December 2025.
