Deliverability
February is when everyone pretends to understand love.
Chocolate companies lean into romance. Jewelry brands deploy urgency. And email senders everywhere decide that hearts, countdown timers, and “just give us one more chance” subject lines are the path to re-engagement.
Here’s what you need to remember:
Valentine’s Day doesn’t enhance brand romance, it just exposes bad relationships. In a big way.
And if your email program only performs well when there’s a holiday to hide behind, you don’t have a campaign problem, you have an attachment style problem.
This is a safe space, so let’s talk about it.
Just like in relationships, your email program has patterns or behavioral tendencies that reveal how secure (or insecure) your strategy really is. But Mailbox providers don’t judge intent, they observe behavior. Here are some of the ones that stick out.
This is the sender who can’t let it go.
You send an email about the sale. Then another one. Then a “reminder.” Then a “final hours” email. Then a “we extended it just for you.” Then a “seriously though, last chance.”
You think you’re nurturing, but subscribers think you’re hovering.
Either way, your e-blast feels like a love bomb and it’s not landing well. In fact, the word is cringe.
Anxious senders operate from scarcity. They panic when engagement drops. They over-send because silence feels like rejection. They manufacture urgency because they don’t trust the relationship to survive without constant poking.
This is the sender who ghosts.
You disappear for months. No emails. No updates. No relationship maintenance at all.
Then Black Friday rolls around and suddenly you’re back, asking for money like nothing happened.
Avoidant senders only show up when they need something. There’s no nurture, no value-add, no “just saying hi.” Every email is begging for a transaction. Every message exists to extract value.
And when subscribers don’t respond? You don’t notice. You just move on to the next campaign, the next holiday, the next opportunity to sell — without ever building trust.
This is the sender who can’t pick a lane.
One week you’re emailing daily. The next week, radio silence. Your sale “ends tonight,” then mysteriously extends for three more days. You say “exclusive,” but send it to everyone. Your voice shifts constantly. Your cadence is unpredictable, you’re hot, then you’re cold.
Disorganized senders create confusion.
And confusion doesn’t quietly convert, it loudly complains and then gets sent to spam.
Subscribers stop knowing what to expect from you. And when your emails do arrive, they’re met with “Why am I getting this?” instead of “Oh good, it’s them!”
This is the sender we should all aim to be.
Secure senders have predictable cadence. Clear value. Honest messaging. They don’t manipulate with fake urgency or panic when one campaign underperforms.
They understand that inbox access is a privilege — not a right.
Trust is built through dedication, not desperation.
If you want to move from anxious, avoidant chaos to a secure strategy, you need to understand what your subscribers actually want from you.
Spoiler: it’s not sweet talk and urgency.
And it’s definitely not heart-shaped boxes of chocolate (because with those, you never know what you’re going to get).
Subscribers want to trust you. Mailbox providers need to in order to let you in the gate.
That means:
When you say a sale ends, it should end. When you say something is exclusive, it should be exclusive. When you promise value, you should actually deliver it.
Fake urgency isn’t just annoying — it’s often against mailbox provider guidelines, and sometimes even consumer protection laws. Gmail explicitly calls out misleading or deceptive content in theirs.
But beyond compliance, lies erode trust.
And trust is the only currency that matters in the inbox.
Email isn’t an infinite scroll app. It’s a finite space where messages linger as long as subscribers allow them to.
If someone saw your email and cared, they probably kept it. They don’t need seventeen reminders with slightly different subject lines.
Quality time means:
If someone clicked a sale but didn’t convert, don’t send another generic blast. Acknowledge interest. Offer something relevant. Then let it go.
Quantity isn’t intimacy.
Intentionality is.
Subscribers want real value, not “value” that’s just a thinly disguised pitch.
Real gifts look like:
One of the fastest ways to feel invisible is making a big purchase, then immediately receiving generic promos as if nothing happened.
Receiving gifts means recognizing where someone is — not pretending they’re still a stranger.
This is where many programs fail spectacularly.
Acts of service mean making the relationship easy.
That looks like:
Give people a middle ground. Let them choose cadence. Let them tell you what matters.
Preference centers aren’t optional.
They’re an act of respect.
Some subscribers want frequent communication. Others don’t.
The key is figuring out what they want not what you need.
This means:
If the relationship feels one-sided – constant asks with little given in return – people take control however they can. Like with the ‘spam’ button.
You’ve diagnosed your attachment style.
You know which love languages you’re neglecting.
Now comes the work.
When someone makes a purchase, the relationship changes. They’re no longer a prospect, it’s official. They’re a customer. And continuing to treat them like a stranger who needs convincing is insulting. To both of you.
The fix: Segment purchasers out of generic promotional campaigns (at least temporarily) Send post-purchase emails that acknowledge the transaction If you’re going to email them about a sale they just used, make it better than what they already got
If your only options are “subscribe to everything” or “unsubscribe forever,” you’re forcing people into extremes. And extremes lead to unsubscribes.
The fix:
Urgency works when it’s real. It fails when it’s fabricated.
The fix:
Re-engagement campaigns can work. But “Do you still want to hear from us? Are you sure? Please click yes so we know you still love us” is not a strategy. It’s clingy and neurotic, and that’s never attractive.
The fix:
Chasing people who don’t want to hear from you tanks your reputation and annoys the people who do.
Go back to the beginning of the relationship. What did people sign up for? A loyalty program with perks? Weekly tips? Early access to sales? New product announcements?
The fix:
The origin story matters. If you promised one thing and delivered another, subscribers won’t stick around.
Mailbox providers care abvout technical signals, but they also watch how people respond to your emails — often in ways your ESP can’t show you.
Anxious sending creates fatigue.
Avoidant sending creates confusion.
Disorganized sending creates distrust.
Secure sending builds trust.
Trust builds sender reputation that translates into inbox placement. Valentine’s Day will come and go. The chocolate will be discounted. The hearts will disappear. But how you show up in the inbox? That’s the relationship.
Make it secure.
Send me the Mailgun newsletter. I expressly agree to receive the newsletter and know that I can easily unsubscribe at any time.